She added that numbers from the campaign finance watch dogs at OpenSecrets.org would say the same: You can go to OpenSecrets.org and check that. I have more donations from students and teachers than I do from people associated with Wall Street.
According to OpenSecrets.org, Clintons official campaign committee has raised nearly $77.5 million so far. And about $3.4 million came from donors in the financial and investment industries (OpenSecrets breaks it down into subcategories: Securities amp; Investment, Misc Finance, and Commercial Banks). Thats just a little over 4 percent of donations -- not exactly the 3 percent Clinton cited during Saturdays debate, but not far off the mark.
(The Clinton campaign later told CBS News that the candidate, during the debate, was only referring to OpenSecrets number from the Securities amp; Investment industry. The $2.04 million given by those in this category make up only 2.6 percent of total campaign donations.)
And as for whether or not more teachers and students donate to the campaign, OpenSecrets.org lists donors in the education industry as giving only about $1.96 million. It ranks fifth of the top industries that donate to Clintons campaign. The securities amp; investment industry ranks one slot higher: its the fourth industry that gives most.
After the debate, the campaign told CBS News that by their accounting, all donations that come from teachers and students (including university professors, tutors, retired teachers, even yoga instructors) actually add up to just over $3 million. According to campaign spokesperson Josh Schwerin, OpenSecrets accounting does not include the campaigns fuller list of small-dollar donations.
Still, Clintons debate-night statement neglects to take into account the other funding sources that function outside of a candidates official campaign committee, like super PACs and other hybrid PACs. According to OpenSecrets.org, outside groups backing Clinton -- including the super PAC Priorities USA Action -- add at least another $20 million into the fundraising mix. And Priorities USA alone has raised a total of $3.1 million from commercial banks and those in the securities and investment industry.
OpenSecrets further warns that only about 64 percent of total campaign and PAC contributions are actually identified and sorted by the industry they came from.
CBS News Hannah Fraser-Chanpong contributed to this report.
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Real estate heir Robert Durst appeared in a New York courtroom on Wednesday on charges of trespassing on property owned by his estranged family.
Durst, who has been questioned about but never charged with several mysterious deaths and disappearances, is accused of violating a restraining order to keep away from relatives, including his brother, Durst Organization President Douglas Durst, in June 2013.
Douglas set me up and caught me, Durst, 71, told reporters outside Manhattans criminal court.
Durst, who was tried and acquitted in Texas of the 2001 murder of a neighbor, called the New York trespassing trial tedious. Defense lawyers said he would not testify.
This is the most boring trial Ive ever been to, said Durst, looking frail and wearing a gray striped suit and black sports boots.
The restraining order is one of 13 aimed at keeping him away from relatives.
The Durst Organization oversees the lease of One World Trade Center, the tallest skyscraper in the Western Hemisphere.
Durst is accused of approaching and peering into security cameras of three residential properties his family owns in New Yorks midtown Manhattan and walking up the exterior stairs of one of them.
This is the latest brush with the law for Durst, who was questioned about but not charged with the disappearance of his wife in 1982 and the murder of a long-time friend in 2000. He was later found living in Texas disguised as a mute woman.
In his Texas trial, Durst admitted to killing and butchering his neighbor but a jury acquitted him of homicide after he argued it was an accidental shooting in self-defense. He was jailed for about three years for related minor charges.
His life inspired the 2010 Hollywood movie All Good Things and the documentary The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst, due to air in February on cable network HBO.
It has been an unlikely journey for a man born into the uppermost echelons of society. The Durst Organization is responsible for a good portion of the citys skyline - 13 million square feet of premiere Manhattan office towers, according to company press releases.
Durst, who now lives in Texas after getting about $65 million from the settlement of a lawsuit he brought against family trusts, most recently was charged with urinating on a drugstore candy rack in Houston.
(Editing by Barbara Goldberg, Lisa Von Ahn and Sandra Maler)
Members of the American Bankers Association recently announced that after years of being ignored in the halls of power, the industry will at last be creating its own super PAC to serve as its proverbial big stick.
For too long, the banking industry has been stuck at 13 on the list of industries giving the most to members of Congress, drowned out by such vehemently anti-banking interests as Misc. Finance (12), Lobbyists (7), Real Estate (5), and Securities and Investment (3).
American Banker editor-at-large Barbara Rehm writes, Frustrated by a lack of political power and fed up with blindly donating to politicians who consistently vote against the industrys interests, a handful of leaders are determined to shake things up.
While I am highly skeptical of the sentiment that Congress is not afraid of bankers, given that banking lobbyists outnumber banking reform advocates 25-1 and that the Chairman of the Senate Financial Services Subommittee seems to believe that the banks own the place, the most ridiculous thing about this announcement may just be the bankers willingness to reveal their strategy for skirting the non-coordination rules.
The Supreme Court and FEC explicitly prohibit Super PACs from coordinating with candidates and their campaigns. I generally interpret this to mean that having a direct conversation with a candidate is a violation of the rules. Yet Matt Packard, the Super PACs chairman, is apparently quite excited about using his new stick in that context, If someone says I am going to give your opponent $5,000 or $10,000, you might say, Yea, okay. But if you say the bankers are going to put in $10,000 or $500,000 or $1 million into your opponents campaign, that starts to draw some attention.
When is Packard imagining himself having this conversation and what will he be asking for to call off the hounds? This statement speaks volumes about how the industry thinks about its involvement in politics.
Note too that Packard says they may be directing money into your opponents campaign. He means that in the same way that one might give to Restore Our Future to support Romney right? Nope. While the coordination rules are twisted enough when it comes to candidate specific super PACs, Friends of Traditional Banking plans to go even further. The independent expenditure-only committee, according to Rehms description, will exist not to touch the money, but to direct it to the candidates actual campaigns.
This is starting to feel like the scene where the Bond villain reveals his whole plan for world domination. Even with a feckless FEC on the beat, Friends of Traditional Banking seems to be inviting federal investigation.
Rehm reports that the first thing prospective donors have been asking Utah Bankers Association president Howard Headlee is, Is this legal? Luckily, Headlee seems to have a Trevor Potter button for that.
Correction: A previous version of this post incorrectly stated that the American Bankers Association created Friends of Traditional Banking. It is not part of this effort.
American Crossroads aims to complicate matters for Elizabeth Warren, arguing that you canât bash Wall Street and then turn around
Â and take millions of dollars of donations on your behalf from the industry you have identified as the locus of all that is wrong with modern America.
Well, you can, but you shouldnât, unless youâre a massive hypocrite whose words mean nothing. Hey, you know what? Carry on, Ms. Warren.
Now that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) â which has deep ties to Wall Street â is raising cash to support self-styled Wall Street reformer Professor Elizabeth Warren, American Crossroads president Steven Law is calling on Warren to:
1.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Return any and all funds she has received from the Wall Street-backed DSCC;
2.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Refuse to accept any future DSCC contributions, coordinated expenditures or ads on her behalf; and
3.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Immediately call on the DSCC to stop using her name for fundraising purposes.
The DSCC, which helped recruit Warren to run for Senate in Massachusetts andÂ is now raising money to use for Warrenâs campaign,Â hasÂ raised more money from Wall Street than from any other industry.Â Since 2005, the DSCC has collected more than $40 million in contributions from Wall Street, the banking and financial services industries.Â Â Just today, DSCC executive director Guy Cecil pledged to âprotectâ Warren with a DSCC âEmergency Media Campaign.â
âFar left professor Elizabeth Warren should get a PhD in hypocrisy for trying to launder Wall Street political cash through the DSCCâs war chest while simultaneously leading the Occupy Wall Street movement,âÂ saidÂ American Crossroads president Steven Law.Â âProfessor Warren ought to put the DSCCâs Wall Street money where her mouth is: and just say no to DSCC support.â
The Financial Services Industry has given more money to the DSCC than any other industry, including trial lawyers or labor unions.
The DSCCâs Wall Street Endowment for Elizabeth Warren
Since 2005 The DSCC Has Taken $40,555,590 From Wall Street, More Than Any Other Industry.Â (Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
ÂÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In The 2012 Election Cycle, The DSCC Took $1,547,805 From Wall Street (The Securities And Investments Industry, Commercial Banks, And Misc Finance).Â Â (Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
ÂÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In The 2010 Election Cycle, The DSCC Took $7,274,205 From Wall Street (The Securities And Investments Industry, Commercial Banks, And Misc Finance).Â Â (Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
ÂÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In The 2008 Election Cycle, The DSCC Took $19,098,584 From Wall Street (The Securities And Investments Industry, Commercial Banks, And Misc Finance).Â Â (Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
ÂÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In The 2006 Election Cycle, The DSCC Took $12,634,996 From Wall Street (The Securities And Investments Industry, Commercial Banks, And Misc Finance).Â Â (Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
The Second Most Generous Industry To The DSCC Is Lawyers/Law Firms, Which Have Given $33,916,522 Since 2005.(Center For Responsive Politics,http://www.opensecrets.org/, Accessed 12/13/11)
Elizabeth Warren, as you may recall, took credit for creating the âmuch of the intellectual foundationâ of the Occupy Wall Street protesters. I know, I know, you dispute the notion that the Occupy Wall Street protesters have any intellectual foundation at all.
For some reason Iâm reminded of Saul Alinskyâs Rules for Radicals: âThe fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.â
The United States air attacks in Syria against ISIS have some strong similarities to Israels military project in the Gaza Strip this summertime, according to kept in mind constitutional lawyer and author Alan Dershowitz.
In a Jerusalem Postarticle Wednesday, Dershowitz mentions retired United States Gen. Wesley Clark, who said the objective of the Syrian airstrikes is to degrade and destroy the infrastructure of terrorist groups, as well as the electrical grid, monetary sources and mixed military-civilian targets.
Israel pursued similar goals throughout Operation Safety Edge this summer. The difference, states Dershowitz, is that a few of the Arab nations supporting US airstrikes vehemently slammed Israel.
Among the most hypocritical nations getting involved in the United States attack is, naturally, Qatar, which not just condemned Israel for defending its residents versus Hamas rockets and tunnels, but actually moneyed the Hamas attacks and offered asylum for the Hamas terrorist leaders who ordered them, Dershowitz writes.
The US and its Arab partners can take preemptive action versus terrorist groups without fear of UN condemnation, a Goldstone Report, or risks to bring its leaders before the International Criminal Court. Yet everything Israel does, despite how careful it is to minimize civilian casualties, ends up being the basis for worldwide condemnation, he charged.
Dershowitz states it will be worth keeping in mind how the world responds to the US project in Syria due to the fact that global law is unclear concerning attacks on targets such as electric grids and sources of finance and is open to selective analysis.
He also notes that international law does not take into account scenarios where the opponent hides its useful military targets behind human shields.
The UN Human being Rights Commission is proceeding with an investigation to see if Israel dedicated war criminal offenses in the Gaza campaign. Israel has refused to take part, calling the commission biased.
On the other hand, a bi-partisan group of US senators has asked the State Department to examine presumed ties in between Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the United Nations Relief and Functions Firm (UNRWA).
Dershowitz is the author of Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israels Simply War Against Hamas.
- Banking, infra schemes made the most money last month
- The No. 1 thing you need in commercial real estate deals
- Alabama's Week In Real Estate (WiRE ending 7/9)
- Post-Brexit: How planning strategies for advisers must evolve
- Maintaining cash flow when the paychecks peter out
- Pro Surfer Cole Robbins Makes Waves in Local Real Estate Market
- New York launches new task force to investigate deceptive lending, real estate crimes